The Kennewick Man Case | Court Documents | Communications with the CourtPlaintiffs' Response to Motion to IntervenePaula A. Barran, OSB No. 80397 Alan L. Schneider, OSB No. 68147 Attorneys for Plaintiffs IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT ROBSON BONNICHSEN, C. LORING BRACE; GEORGE W. GILL, C. VANCE HAYNES, JR., RICHARD L. JANTZ, DOUGLAS W. OWSLEY, DENNIS J. STANFORD and D. GENTRY STEELE, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, FRANCIS P. McMANAMON, ERNEST J. HARRELL, WILLIAM E. BULEN, JR., DONALD R. CURTIS, LEE TURNER, LOUIS CALDERA, BRUCE BABBITT, DONALD J. BARRY, CARL A. STROCK, and JOE N. BALLARD, Defendants. Plaintiffs' Response to Motion to Intervene Plaintiffs have received a copy of a motion to intervene by Joseph P. Siofele. Given that this case has been pending for close to five years and that plaintiffs' motion to vacate defendants' second administrative action has already been briefed and argued, plaintiffs ask the Court to deny Mr. Siofele's motion to intervene.(1) However, plaintiffs have no objection to the Court's considering the content of Mr. Siofele's filing on the present motion to vacate. Respectfully submitted this 30rd day of July, 2001 BARRAN LIEBMAN LLP ALAN L. SCHNEIDER, PC ______________ Return to Communications with the Court |